Outcomes of Ecuador’s Rights of Nature for Nature’s Sake
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.21926/aeer.2203035
- Authors
- Kelly Swing · Jaime A. Chaves · Stella de la Torre · Luis Sempértegui · Alex R. Hearn · Andrea C. Encalada · Esteban Suárez · Gonzalo Rivas
- Reported year
- 2022
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.875626+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-10T16:58:51.248069+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
San Francisco State University · Universidad San Francisco de Quito
Reported affiliation countries
EC · US
Documentary abstract — original language
The rights of nature have been widely discussed at a philosophical level for a long time, but examples of its practical application are quite rare. Ecuador is the first country to incorporate this concept into its constitutional foundation and put the theory into practice. However, implementing entirely justifiable rights of nature is hindered by factors, such as economic considerations, legal interpretations, cultural norms, political will, and disproportionate perspectives of "the greater good". After getting opportunities for more than a decade to convert theoretical concepts into tangible results for nature, many doubts remain concerning the applied practicality of this ideology. لقد نوقشت حقوق الطبيعة على نطاق واسع على المستوى الفلسفي لفترة طويلة، لكن أمثلة تطبيقها العملي نادرة جدًا. والإكوادور هي أول بلد يدمج هذا المفهوم في أساسه الدستوري ويضع النظرية موضع التنفيذ. ومع ذلك، فإن تنفيذ حقوق الطبيعة المبررة تمامًا تعوقه عوامل، مثل الاعتبارات الاقتصادية والتفسيرات القانونية والأعراف الثقافية والإرادة السياسية والمنظورات غير المتناسبة لـ "الصالح العام". بعد الحصول على فرص لأكثر من عقد لتحويل المفاهيم النظرية إلى نتائج ملموسة للطبيعة، لا تزال هناك العديد من الشكوك حول التطبيق العملي لهذه الأيديولوجية. Les droits de la nature ont été largement discutés au niveau philosophique depuis longtemps, mais les exemples de leur application pratique sont assez rares. L'Équateur est le premier pays à intégrer ce concept dans son fondement constitutionnel et à mettre la théorie en pratique. Cependant, la mise en œuvre des droits de la nature entièrement justifiables est entravée par des facteurs tels que des considérations économiques, des interprétations juridiques, des normes culturelles, la volonté politique et des perspectives disproportionnées du « bien commun ». Après avoir eu l'occasion pendant plus d'une décennie de convertir des concepts théoriques en résultats tangibles pour la nature, de nombreux doutes subsistent quant à la praticité appliquée de cette idéologie. Los derechos de la naturaleza han sido ampliamente discutidos a nivel filosófico durante mucho tiempo, pero los ejemplos de su aplicación práctica son bastante raros. Ecuador es el primer país en incorporar este concepto en su fundamento constitucional y poner en práctica la teoría. Sin embargo, la implementación de los derechos de la naturaleza totalmente justificables se ve obstaculizada por factores como las consideraciones económicas, las interpretaciones legales, las normas culturales, la voluntad política y las perspectivas desproporcionadas del "bien común". Después de obtener oportunidades durante más de una década para convertir conceptos teóricos en resultados tangibles para la naturaleza, quedan muchas dudas sobre la practicidad aplicada de esta ideología.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W4296625803
- DOI
- 10.21926/aeer.2203035 · 10.60692/cx6jm-sym58 · 10.60692/gnvkc-n6s06
- OPENAIRE
- doi_dedup___::d08eb4beeec98cba7524168c508d5a5a
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- Article · Text · article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- EC
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
DataCite · Record 1 · Record 2 · Record 3 · Record 4 · Record 5 · Record 6
OpenAIRE · Record 1
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
- DOI · https://doi.org/10.21926/aeer.2203035
- DOI · https://doi.org/10.60692/cx6jm-sym58
- DOI · https://doi.org/10.60692/gnvkc-n6s06
- Document · https://gresis.osc.int//doi/10.60692/cx6jm-sym58
- Document · https://gresis.osc.int//doi/10.60692/gnvkc-n6s06
- OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W4296625803
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- openalex:w1970327448 · CITES
- openalex:w2034873535 · CITES
- openalex:w2058652198 · CITES
- openalex:w2093855979 · CITES
- openalex:w2299240224 · CITES
- openalex:w2466991571 · CITES
- openalex:w2473015971 · CITES
- openalex:w2549356753 · CITES
- openalex:w2562774005 · CITES
- openalex:w2569937251 · CITES
- openalex:w2598639480 · CITES
- openalex:w2609762243 · CITES
- openalex:w2758171098 · CITES
- openalex:w2758460488 · CITES
- openalex:w2765680554 · CITES
- openalex:w2769699816 · CITES
- openalex:w2784774916 · CITES
- openalex:w2911538467 · CITES
- openalex:w2916500799 · CITES
- openalex:w2917064244 · CITES
5 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Kelly Swing; Jaime A. Chaves; Stella de la Torre; Luis Sempértegui; Alex R. Hearn; Andrea C. Encalada; Esteban Suárez; Gonzalo Rivas. Outcomes of Ecuador’s Rights of Nature for Nature’s Sake. 2022. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-0e7f37c1964cf4404e36f34dcfc3b0de/
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Kelly Swing; Jaime A. Chaves; Stella de la Torre; Luis Sempértegui; Alex R. Hearn; Andrea C. Encalada; Esteban Suárez; Gonzalo Rivas. (2022). Outcomes of Ecuador’s Rights of Nature for Nature’s Sake. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-0e7f37c1964cf4404e36f34dcfc3b0de/
- Chicago
- Kelly Swing; Jaime A. Chaves; Stella de la Torre; Luis Sempértegui; Alex R. Hearn; Andrea C. Encalada; Esteban Suárez; Gonzalo Rivas. Outcomes of Ecuador’s Rights of Nature for Nature’s Sake. 2022. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-0e7f37c1964cf4404e36f34dcfc3b0de/
- ISO 690
- Kelly Swing; Jaime A. Chaves; Stella de la Torre; Luis Sempértegui; Alex R. Hearn; Andrea C. Encalada; Esteban Suárez; Gonzalo Rivas. Outcomes of Ecuador’s Rights of Nature for Nature’s Sake. 2022. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-0e7f37c1964cf4404e36f34dcfc3b0de/
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Outcomes of Ecuador’s Rights of Nature for Nature’s Sake. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-0e7f37c1964cf4404e36f34dcfc3b0de/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 49af51d234fc2742 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- DataCite · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.875626+00:00
DataCite · source · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.393508+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Authors
- DataCite · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.875626+00:00
DataCite · source · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.393508+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Year
- DataCite · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.875626+00:00
DataCite · source · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.393508+00:00 - Identifiers
- DataCite · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.875626+00:00
DataCite · source · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.393508+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source URL
- DataCite · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.875626+00:00
DataCite · source · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.393508+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source-reported author ORCID
- DataCite cached metadata · source · 2026-11-10T13:49:46.828383+00:00
DataCite cached metadata · source · 2026-11-10T13:49:46.828383+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
d10cd9e46da829a9 · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.393655+00:00
d20c6bbf7507eded · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.393655+00:00
04d009f58c22c4ad · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.393655+00:00
1dd1f18e89f3d5e4 · 2026-11-10T13:50:23.814666+00:00
5ccac1e16d81efdc · 2026-11-10T16:26:20.245282+00:00
b00a813a6a4ebb29 · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.248069+00:00
49af51d234fc2742 · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.248069+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
EC ·
San Francisco State University
Universidad San Francisco de Quito
Source roles
Bibliographic / original publication source · https://doi.org/10.21926/aeer.2203035
Bibliographic / original publication source · https://doi.org/10.60692/cx6jm-sym58
Bibliographic / original publication source · https://doi.org/10.60692/gnvkc-n6s06
Bibliographic / original publication source · https://gresis.osc.int//doi/10.60692/cx6jm-sym58
Bibliographic / original publication source · https://gresis.osc.int//doi/10.60692/gnvkc-n6s06
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W4296625803
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.