CONSTITUTIONAL VISION OF THE GREEN TRANSITION: the experiences of Bolivia and Ecuador
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.51799/2763-8685v6n1012
- Authors
- Juan David Alarcón Morales
- Reported year
- 2026
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:06:11.458557+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:14:59.775774+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Documentary abstract — original language
In Latin America, only Bolivia and Ecuador have managed to enshrine the principles and objectives of the green transition in their constitutions, linked to the recognition of the rights of Mother Earth. This has broken with the genealogical structure of the Roman legal system and established a direct proportional relationship with the rights of indigenous peoples. They have succeeded in building a sustainable constitutionalism and jurisprudence aligned with the recognition of the rights of Mother Earth within the framework of “Living Well” (Buen Vivir). This framework grants the State powers to promote, protect, and defend the recognized rights to land and biodiversity. However, in practice, these rights clash with corporate interests that override their own and establish mechanisms of fragmentation that delay the implementation of these rights to the point of violating them, to the detriment of future generations. This situation creates a dilemma between the relevance of judicial decisions and the dynamics of development.
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.51799/2763-8685v6n1012
- OPENAIRE
- doi_________::8f21b0628a7f6c6fc35f960f47a76da8
- OPENALEX
- W7167735508
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- Article · article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- BO · EC
- Natural entities mentioned
- Mother Earth
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAIRE · Record 1
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Juan David Alarcón Morales. CONSTITUTIONAL VISION OF THE GREEN TRANSITION: the experiences of Bolivia and Ecuador. 2026. https://doi.org/10.51799/2763-8685v6n1012
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Juan David Alarcón Morales. (2026). CONSTITUTIONAL VISION OF THE GREEN TRANSITION: the experiences of Bolivia and Ecuador. https://doi.org/10.51799/2763-8685v6n1012
- Chicago
- Juan David Alarcón Morales. CONSTITUTIONAL VISION OF THE GREEN TRANSITION: the experiences of Bolivia and Ecuador. 2026. https://doi.org/10.51799/2763-8685v6n1012
- ISO 690
- Juan David Alarcón Morales. CONSTITUTIONAL VISION OF THE GREEN TRANSITION: the experiences of Bolivia and Ecuador. 2026. https://doi.org/10.51799/2763-8685v6n1012
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. CONSTITUTIONAL VISION OF THE GREEN TRANSITION: the experiences of Bolivia and Ecuador. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-0b2cb277f066fea4bad147dfd786ecfb/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 1731d6b05bea69a9 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:11.458557+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:14:59.775774+00:00 - Authors
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:11.458557+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:14:59.775774+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Year
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:11.458557+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:14:59.775774+00:00 - Identifiers
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:11.458557+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:14:59.775774+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source URL
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:11.458557+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:14:59.775774+00:00 - Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:14:59.775774+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
c933970cb7ba5efb · 2026-11-09T19:14:59.775774+00:00
d4d4f12ce299fa78 · 2026-11-09T19:14:59.775774+00:00
86d15badce23bd89 · 2026-11-09T19:14:59.775774+00:00
1731d6b05bea69a9 · 2026-11-09T19:14:59.775774+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.51799/2763-8685v6n1012
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W7167735508
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.