Grassroots Capacity Building for REDD+: Lessons from Nepal
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.3126/jfl.v11i2.8617
- Authors
- Harisharan Luintel · Chandra Shekhar Silori · Simone Frick · Bishnu Hari Poudyal
- Reported year
- 2013
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:18:42.890956+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:18:42.890956+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Network for Business Sustainability · Portland State University
Documentary abstract — original language
Meaningful engagement and effective participation of grassroots stakeholders and forest managing communities in national policy formulation and local institutional processes for forest management have implications for the future global climate regime and poverty reduction among forestdependent poor. In this context, the institutional and technical capacity of grassroots stakeholders is critical in ensuring effective and successful implementation of Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation, including Conservation and Sustainable Management of Forests and Enhancement of Forest Carbon Stocks (REDD+). Capacity building for grassroots stakeholders is particularly crucial as REDD+ has to be implemented in a complex local environment shaped by multiple land use systems, sharply divided politics, conflicting policies, different levels of forest dependencies, complex social relations, unclear governance and tenure structures and differential climate impacts. It has been learned from the grassroots capacity building programme that there is a need of partnership and collaboration between grassroots stakeholders to build capacity for fighting against climate change at local level. However, there is no ‘one size fits all’ formula for capacity building, partnership and collaboration. Multi-pronged and multi-scale capacity strengthening strategies that draw on the strengths of various learning methods and address the unique needs of targeted stakeholders would be effective. These would/ should always be target-driven, addressing the specific needs and conditions of stakeholders, and reflecting their sustainable development strategies, priorities and initiatives. There is still a need to re-orient and strengthen the capacity of the key stakeholders of REDD+ in Nepal so that they can better analyse and understand their own carbon forestry conditions and develop strategies to get more benefits from the REDD+ scheme.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jfl.v11i2.8617 Journal of Forestry and Livelihood Vol.11(2) 2013 1-13
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W2076706765
- DOI
- 10.3126/jfl.v11i2.8617
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- NP
- Natural entities mentioned
- Forest
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- openalex:w1805965189 · CITES
- openalex:w1822763924 · CITES
- openalex:w2058967873 · CITES
- openalex:w2067961243 · CITES
- openalex:w2076926005 · CITES
- openalex:w2087163511 · CITES
- openalex:w2088208286 · CITES
- openalex:w2096036185 · CITES
- openalex:w2096072348 · CITES
- openalex:w2104769121 · CITES
- openalex:w2108787662 · CITES
- openalex:w2133100151 · CITES
- openalex:w2139150181 · CITES
- openalex:w2166227492 · CITES
- openalex:w2592775545 · CITES
- openalex:w3129111050 · CITES
- openalex:w41464513 · CITES
- openalex:w961381873 · CITES
- REDD, forest governance and rural livelihoods: the emerging agenda · CITES
0 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Harisharan Luintel; Chandra Shekhar Silori; Simone Frick; Bishnu Hari Poudyal. Grassroots Capacity Building for REDD+: Lessons from Nepal. 2013. https://doi.org/10.3126/jfl.v11i2.8617
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Harisharan Luintel; Chandra Shekhar Silori; Simone Frick; Bishnu Hari Poudyal. (2013). Grassroots Capacity Building for REDD+: Lessons from Nepal. https://doi.org/10.3126/jfl.v11i2.8617
- Chicago
- Harisharan Luintel; Chandra Shekhar Silori; Simone Frick; Bishnu Hari Poudyal. Grassroots Capacity Building for REDD+: Lessons from Nepal. 2013. https://doi.org/10.3126/jfl.v11i2.8617
- ISO 690
- Harisharan Luintel; Chandra Shekhar Silori; Simone Frick; Bishnu Hari Poudyal. Grassroots Capacity Building for REDD+: Lessons from Nepal. 2013. https://doi.org/10.3126/jfl.v11i2.8617
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Grassroots Capacity Building for REDD+: Lessons from Nepal. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-0a7bcc55b1925d14594d273aa52ddef9/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 1ee98e32255d4361 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:42.890956+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:42.890956+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:42.890956+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:42.890956+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:42.890956+00:00
- Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:42.890956+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:42.890956+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
53741bbed3bbc344 · 2026-11-09T19:18:42.890956+00:00
32c25d983744b0f3 · 2026-11-09T19:18:42.890956+00:00
5e459189c6321622 · 2026-11-09T19:18:42.890956+00:00
1ee98e32255d4361 · 2026-11-09T19:18:42.890956+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
NP ·
Network for Business Sustainability
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.3126/jfl.v11i2.8617
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W2076706765
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.