Advisory Opinion AO-32/25 Requested by Chile and Colom. – Climate Emergency & H.R. (Inter-Am. Ct. H.R.)
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.1017/ilm.2026.10148
- Authors
- Rosa · Naomi
- Reported year
- 2026
- Reported language
- en · eng
- Source type
- Article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:05:30.102034+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:06:33.890505+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Documentary abstract — original language
Abstract This note analyzes Advisory Opinion 32/25 of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, which characterizes the climate emergency as a human rights issue that is urgent, structural, and a threat to human dignity. It explains the Court’s recognition of an enhanced due diligence standard that requires states to prevent and respond to climate harms, regulate private actors, and align domestic legal frameworks and climate policies with human rights obligations. The note highlights the Court’s acknowledgment of a standalone right to a healthy climate, the recognition of nature as a subject of rights, and the centrality of science in shaping climate action. It further examines the Opinion’s focus on equality and non-discrimination, emphasizing the disproportionate impacts of climate change on vulnerable groups. Finally, this note explores the Advisory Opinion’s robust guarantees of participation, access to information, and judicial protection, and their implications for global climate jurisprudence.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W7171681634
- DOI
- 10.1017/ilm.2026.10148
- OPENAIRE
- doi_________::3b93e55052e4788a4dabc0c3f8483094
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- Article · article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- CL
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAIRE · Record 1
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Rosa; Naomi. Advisory Opinion AO-32/25 Requested by Chile and Colom. – Climate Emergency & H.R. (Inter-Am. Ct. H.R.). 2026. https://doi.org/10.1017/ilm.2026.10148
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Rosa; Naomi. (2026). Advisory Opinion AO-32/25 Requested by Chile and Colom. – Climate Emergency & H.R. (Inter-Am. Ct. H.R.). https://doi.org/10.1017/ilm.2026.10148
- Chicago
- Rosa; Naomi. Advisory Opinion AO-32/25 Requested by Chile and Colom. – Climate Emergency & H.R. (Inter-Am. Ct. H.R.). 2026. https://doi.org/10.1017/ilm.2026.10148
- ISO 690
- Rosa; Naomi. Advisory Opinion AO-32/25 Requested by Chile and Colom. – Climate Emergency & H.R. (Inter-Am. Ct. H.R.). 2026. https://doi.org/10.1017/ilm.2026.10148
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Advisory Opinion AO-32/25 Requested by Chile and Colom. – Climate Emergency & H.R. (Inter-Am. Ct. H.R.). Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-02d534763ff2c0d1dcdd9d8d40c1fa7d/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 46b17818ab07c74a · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:33.890505+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:30.102034+00:00 - Authors
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:33.890505+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:30.102034+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Year
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:33.890505+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:30.102034+00:00 - Identifiers
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:33.890505+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:30.102034+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source URL
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:33.890505+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:30.102034+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
767ca149751ee53f · 2026-11-09T19:06:33.890505+00:00
365f0b92f8c1f170 · 2026-11-09T19:06:33.890505+00:00
11f227c814a0fcf2 · 2026-11-09T19:06:33.890505+00:00
46b17818ab07c74a · 2026-11-09T19:06:33.890505+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
CL ·
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.1017/ilm.2026.10148
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W7171681634
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.