UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Child Rights Protection Compliance Ecosystem in Indonesia: Harmonization of the CRC, Digital Risks, Legal Pluralism, and Participation

Identification

Public canonical key

doi:10.38035/gijlss.v4i2.895

Authors

Muhammad Fachri Said · Syawal Amirul Syah · Andika Prawira Buana · Andi Sri Rezky Wulandari

Reported year

2026

Reported language

en

Source type

article

First detected

2026-11-09T19:04:47.935685+00:00

Last metadata observation

2026-11-09T19:04:47.935685+00:00

Last HTTP verification

Not checked

Institutions reported by the source

Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Reported affiliation countries

ID

Documentary abstract — original language

This article examined the minimum obligations of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) can be operationalized in the Indonesian context, which was characterized by legal pluralism and accelerating digital risks. Using normative legal research methods through legislative, conceptual, and limited comparative approaches, this study maps CRC standards and General Comments (particularly GC 5, GC 12, and GC 25) onto national norms, institutional mandates, and implementation-enforcement mechanisms. The findings showed the main problem was not merely a lack of norms, but rather an implementation enforcement gap in the compliance infrastructure: coherence between regimes (child protection, data protection, and platform governance), capacity and coordination across actors, and the absence of auditable procedural indicators to test best interests, protection, and participation. This article proposes a "compliance ecosystem" framework that combines (i) implementation guidelines based on Best Interests Assessment and reason-giving as a bridge for legal pluralism, (ii) protective regulations in the digital space that place the obligation of risk assessment and mitigation on electronic system/platform operators, and (iii) child participation designs that can demonstrate influence through procedural standards and outcome-based monitoring and evaluation.

Identifiers

OPENALEX

W7166862065

DOI

10.38035/gijlss.v4i2.895

Documentary context

Documentary family

Scholarship

Source-reported types

article

Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources

ID

Natural entities mentioned

Ecosystem

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v4i2.895
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7166862065

Documented bibliographic relations

Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.

• openalex:w3138334318 · CITES
• openalex:w4312326771 · CITES
• openalex:w4409769812 · CITES

0 incoming references within the detected corpus

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.