{"id":"r-61df119af103fd87d0c364452911e667","title":"Sentencia C-467/16","authors":["Corte Constitucional de Colombia"],"year":2016,"type":"case_law","language":"es","jurisdictions":["CO"],"identifiers":{"case_number":["C-467/16"]},"permanent_url":"https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-61df119af103fd87d0c364452911e667/","source_urls":["https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2016/C-467-16.htm"],"courts":["Corte Constitucional de Colombia"],"publishers":[],"legislative_bodies":[],"reported_dates":{"decision_date":"2016-08-31"},"named_natural_entities":[],"book_relations":{"parent_book_id":null,"chapter_ids":[]},"documentary_status":"DETECTED","first_indexed":"2026-11-09T19:04:47.840146+00:00","last_metadata_update":"2026-11-09T19:04:47.840146+00:00","last_verified":null,"rights":"Bibliographic facts only; third-party source terms apply. No abstract/full-text redistribution.","recorded_source_links":[],"validation_status":"RELEVANCE_PENDING","public_library_admissible":true,"public_library_url":"https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-legal-library/?ref=r-61df119af103fd87d0c364452911e667","uglc_assessment":{"effectiveness":{"basis":"AUTOMATIC_EXPLICIT_EVIDENCE","canonical_legal_work_id":"r-61df119af103fd87d0c364452911e667","reason_en":"The court upheld the challenged language in Civil Code articles 655 and 658 as to the grounds examined. The ruling confers no rights-holder status on animals.","reason_fr":"La Cour a maintenu la constitutionnalité des expressions contestées des articles 655 et 658 du Code civil pour les griefs examinés. Cette décision ne confère aucun statut de titulaire de droits aux animaux.","sources":[{"axis":"effectiveness","content_kind":"JUDICIAL_DISPOSITION","excerpt":"DECLARAR EXEQUIBLES, por los cargos analizados","excerpt_sha256":"1ad1caa00bfa0c5df5f6ab2ea8d35737fc4651e8ebdbb28fb2e8aa1c4f7b6a63","identity_match":true,"locator":"III. Decisión, RESUELVE","provenance":"IDENTITY_MATCHED_OFFICIAL_PRIMARY_TEXT","public_id":"r-61df119af103fd87d0c364452911e667","reason_en":"The court upheld the challenged language in Civil Code articles 655 and 658 as to the grounds examined. The ruling confers no rights-holder status on animals.","reason_fr":"La Cour a maintenu la constitutionnalité des expressions contestées des articles 655 et 658 du Code civil pour les griefs examinés. Cette décision ne confère aucun statut de titulaire de droits aux animaux.","scope":"EXPRESS_SCOPE_OF_IDENTIFIED_JUDGMENT","source_authority":"Corte Constitucional de Colombia","source_priority":1,"source_text_hash_scope":"RETAINED_DECISIVE_PASSAGE","source_text_sha256":"1ad1caa00bfa0c5df5f6ab2ea8d35737fc4651e8ebdbb28fb2e8aa1c4f7b6a63","source_title":"Sentencia C-467/16","source_url":"https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2016/C-467-16.htm","source_verified":true,"term":"other","verified_at":"2026-11-11T00:30:54.638649+00:00"}],"status":"QUALIFIED","terms":["other"],"verified_at":"2026-11-11T00:30:54.638649+00:00"},"legal_status":{"basis":"AUTOMATIC_EVIDENCE_SUFFICIENCY_ASSESSMENT","reason_en":"The evidence currently available does not establish this axis; no targeted documentary lead is established at this stage. This revisable state means neither an absence of rights nor an absence of a legal mechanism.","reason_fr":"Les éléments actuellement disponibles ne permettent pas d’établir cet axe ; aucune piste documentaire ciblée n’est établie à ce stade. Cet état est révisable et ne signifie ni absence de droits ni absence de mécanisme juridique.","sources":[],"status":"INDETERMINABLE","terms":[]},"object":{"basis":"AUTOMATIC_EVIDENCE_SUFFICIENCY_ASSESSMENT","reason_en":"The evidence currently available does not establish this axis; no targeted documentary lead is established at this stage. This revisable state means neither an absence of rights nor an absence of a legal mechanism.","reason_fr":"Les éléments actuellement disponibles ne permettent pas d’établir cet axe ; aucune piste documentaire ciblée n’est établie à ce stade. Cet état est révisable et ne signifie ni absence de droits ni absence de mécanisme juridique.","sources":[],"status":"INDETERMINABLE","terms":[]},"obligations":{"basis":"AUTOMATIC_EXPLICIT_EVIDENCE","canonical_legal_work_id":"r-61df119af103fd87d0c364452911e667","reason_en":"The majority explains that the constitutional animal-protection duty and prohibition of mistreatment remain applicable when animals are subject to the civil property regime.","reason_fr":"La majorité rappelle que le devoir constitutionnel de protection animale et l’interdiction des mauvais traitements subsistent lorsque des animaux sont soumis au régime civil des biens.","sources":[{"axis":"obligations","content_kind":"JUDICIAL_REASONS","excerpt":"deber constitucional de protección animal","excerpt_sha256":"4d11b1758d1f7048f2fe5fe7bfeaaeda6e4f558cba1228fcba80038f73684098","identity_match":true,"locator":"Majority reasons, §§ 7.2.3 and 8.2.1","provenance":"IDENTITY_MATCHED_OFFICIAL_PRIMARY_TEXT","public_id":"r-61df119af103fd87d0c364452911e667","reason_en":"The majority explains that the constitutional animal-protection duty and prohibition of mistreatment remain applicable when animals are subject to the civil property regime.","reason_fr":"La majorité rappelle que le devoir constitutionnel de protection animale et l’interdiction des mauvais traitements subsistent lorsque des animaux sont soumis au régime civil des biens.","scope":"EXPRESS_SCOPE_OF_IDENTIFIED_JUDGMENT","source_authority":"Corte Constitucional de Colombia","source_priority":1,"source_text_hash_scope":"RETAINED_DECISIVE_PASSAGE","source_text_sha256":"4d11b1758d1f7048f2fe5fe7bfeaaeda6e4f558cba1228fcba80038f73684098","source_title":"Sentencia C-467/16","source_url":"https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2016/C-467-16.htm","source_verified":true,"term":"negative_obligation","verified_at":"2026-11-11T00:30:54.638649+00:00"}],"status":"QUALIFIED","terms":["negative_obligation"],"verified_at":"2026-11-11T00:30:54.638649+00:00"},"remedies":{"basis":"AUTOMATIC_EVIDENCE_SUFFICIENCY_ASSESSMENT","reason_en":"The evidence currently available does not establish this axis; no targeted documentary lead is established at this stage. This revisable state means neither an absence of rights nor an absence of a legal mechanism.","reason_fr":"Les éléments actuellement disponibles ne permettent pas d’établir cet axe ; aucune piste documentaire ciblée n’est établie à ce stade. Cet état est révisable et ne signifie ni absence de droits ni absence de mécanisme juridique.","sources":[],"status":"INDETERMINABLE","terms":[]},"representation":{"basis":"AUTOMATIC_EVIDENCE_SUFFICIENCY_ASSESSMENT","reason_en":"The evidence currently available does not establish this axis; no targeted documentary lead is established at this stage. This revisable state means neither an absence of rights nor an absence of a legal mechanism.","reason_fr":"Les éléments actuellement disponibles ne permettent pas d’établir cet axe ; aucune piste documentaire ciblée n’est établie à ce stade. Cet état est révisable et ne signifie ni absence de droits ni absence de mécanisme juridique.","sources":[],"status":"INDETERMINABLE","terms":[]},"standing":{"basis":"AUTOMATIC_EVIDENCE_SUFFICIENCY_ASSESSMENT","reason_en":"The evidence currently available does not establish this axis; no targeted documentary lead is established at this stage. This revisable state means neither an absence of rights nor an absence of a legal mechanism.","reason_fr":"Les éléments actuellement disponibles ne permettent pas d’établir cet axe ; aucune piste documentaire ciblée n’est établie à ce stade. Cet état est révisable et ne signifie ni absence de droits ni absence de mécanisme juridique.","sources":[],"status":"INDETERMINABLE","terms":[]},"substantive_rights":{"basis":"AUTOMATIC_EVIDENCE_SUFFICIENCY_ASSESSMENT","reason_en":"The evidence currently available does not establish this axis; no targeted documentary lead is established at this stage. This revisable state means neither an absence of rights nor an absence of a legal mechanism.","reason_fr":"Les éléments actuellement disponibles ne permettent pas d’établir cet axe ; aucune piste documentaire ciblée n’est établie à ce stade. Cet état est révisable et ne signifie ni absence de droits ni absence de mécanisme juridique.","sources":[],"status":"INDETERMINABLE","terms":[]}},"qualified_axis_count":2,"uglc_method":"UGLC_EVIDENCE_RESOLUTION_3.0","record_version":"865d36f9f1ff8a5d","provenance_url":"/api/v1/records/r-61df119af103fd87d0c364452911e667/provenance?snapshot=ledger-20261111-052153Z-7afe2ffd","author_identifiers":[],"institution_identifiers":[],"citation_data":{"id":"https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-61df119af103fd87d0c364452911e667/","type":"legal_case","URL":"https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-61df119af103fd87d0c364452911e667/","title":"Sentencia C-467/16","authority":"Corte Constitucional de Colombia","author":[{"literal":"Corte Constitucional de Colombia"}],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016]]},"language":"es","number":"C-467/16"},"legal_lifecycle":{"case_procedural_chain":{"appeal":"UNKNOWN","conflicts":[],"court":"UNKNOWN","coverage_status":"UNKNOWN","documentary_relations":[],"enforcement":"UNKNOWN","events":[],"filing":"UNKNOWN","first_instance_decision":"UNKNOWN","inadmissibility":"UNKNOWN","instrument_id":"r-61df119af103fd87d0c364452911e667","jurisdiction":"UNKNOWN","later_modification":"UNKNOWN","official_identifier":"UNKNOWN","remand":"UNKNOWN","reversal":"UNKNOWN","supreme_constitutional_review":"UNKNOWN"},"primary_document_verification":{"canonical_work_id":"r-61df119af103fd87d0c364452911e667","status":"VERIFIED_PRIMARY","verification_receipts":[{"authority":"Corte Constitucional de Colombia","identity":"Sentencia C-467/16","locator":"III. Decisión, RESUELVE","source_url":"https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2016/C-467-16.htm","verified_at":"2026-11-11T00:30:54.638649+00:00"},{"authority":"Corte Constitucional de Colombia","identity":"Sentencia C-467/16","locator":"Majority reasons, §§ 7.2.3 and 8.2.1","source_url":"https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2016/C-467-16.htm","verified_at":"2026-11-11T00:30:54.638649+00:00"}],"verified_sources":["https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2016/C-467-16.htm"]},"primary_source_verification":{"checked_at":null,"evidence":[],"scope":"DOCUMENT_IDENTITY_METADATA_ONLY; NOT_LEGAL_STATUS_OR_FULLTEXT_VALIDATION","source_url":"https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2016/C-467-16.htm","status":"OFFICIAL_CANDIDATE"}},"source_link_assessment":[{"url":"https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2016/C-467-16.htm","exists_in_metadata":true,"syntactically_valid":true,"resolves":"NOT_CHECKED","http_verified_at":null,"source_role":"issuing_authority_candidate","source_role_is_not_legal_validation":true,"full_text_accessible":"NOT_TESTED_METADATA_ONLY"}],"legal_authority_status":"NOT_CONFERRED_BY_DISCOVERY"}